Online games are all about timing. Whether you’re dodging in a battle royale, passing the ball in a soccer sim, or taking a shot in a first-person shooter, every millisecond matters. Players notice delays. Even slight lag can change the outcome of a game or ruin the experience completely.
For developers, latency isn’t just a technical issue. It’s a key part of how the game feels. High latency means slow response times, unpredictable gameplay, and frustrated users. Keeping latency low helps games feel smooth, fair, and immersive.
What This Article Covers About Latency
This article explains the factors that cause latency in online games and what developers can do to reduce it. We’ll look at network paths, server placement, code optimization, and player-side settings.
We’ll also cover the role of WebSockets, UDP vs. TCP, prediction models, and how smart architecture choices can lead to better performance.
What Latency Really Means
Latency is the time it takes for a signal to travel from a player’s device to the game server and back. This round-trip time affects how quickly actions register on screen.
It’s usually measured in milliseconds. Lower is better. Anything under 50ms is typically fine. Over 100ms, players may start noticing lag. Beyond 150ms, things get frustrating.
Latency isn’t caused by one thing. It’s a combination of network speed, server distance, device performance, and how the game is built. Reducing any one of these can improve the overall experience.
Choosing the Right Protocol
Most online games use either TCP or UDP to send data. TCP ensures that every packet is delivered in order, which works well for things like chat or turn-based games.
But for fast-paced multiplayer games, UDP is usually better. It sends data faster and doesn’t wait for acknowledgments. Even if a packet is lost, the game can continue.
Using UDP means building systems that can handle lost or out-of-order messages. But the speed boost is worth it for real-time games where every frame counts.
WebSockets and Real-Time Data
For web-based games or hybrid mobile games, WebSockets offer a way to maintain a continuous connection between the client and server.
WebSockets are built on top of TCP but allow for faster, two-way communication. They work well for action games and live multiplayer rooms where frequent updates are sent.
Developers using WebSockets need to be careful about how often messages are sent. Sending too many updates can cause congestion and lead to more latency, not less.
Server Location and Global Access
One of the biggest factors in latency is physical distance. The farther a server is from a player, the longer it takes for data to travel.
Using a single server for all players doesn’t work well for global games. Instead, developers often deploy multiple servers in different regions and route players to the nearest one.
This can be managed with edge networking, cloud platforms, or custom-built infrastructure. The goal is to minimize the number of network hops and reduce time spent in transit.
Code That Moves Quickly
Backend code matters too. Even if the network is fast, slow logic can delay responses. Every part of the game loop should be optimized for speed.
Database calls should be minimized or cached. Functions that deal with movement, hit detection, and combat should run fast and avoid blocking other operations.
Games that use event queues need to watch for bottlenecks. Delays in processing events can stack up quickly and lead to lag—even with a stable connection.
Predicting Player Actions
Many games use prediction to hide latency. This means showing players an outcome before the server confirms it.
For example, if a player presses jump, the game may animate the jump immediately, assuming the server will agree. If the server later disagrees, the game corrects the action.
Prediction keeps the game feeling responsive. But it comes with risks. If the prediction is wrong too often, it can lead to rubber-banding or confusing corrections. Fine-tuning prediction systems takes testing and patience.
Rate Limiting and Message Size
Not all lag is caused by slow networks. Sometimes the issue is that the game is sending too much data too often.
Limiting the number of messages sent per second and compressing data can reduce strain on both the client and the server. Large payloads should be broken into smaller chunks when possible.
Avoid sending data that isn’t needed. For instance, if a player’s position hasn’t changed, there’s no need to broadcast an update. Smarter logic reduces noise and keeps traffic focused.
Prioritizing What Matters
In some cases, not all game data needs to be treated equally. For example, position updates may be more important than cosmetic updates.
Prioritizing critical data and sending non-essential info less frequently can help manage bandwidth and keep gameplay responsive.
Some engines allow developers to tag messages by importance or create separate channels for high-priority communication. Use these features to keep the most important data moving fast.
Client Settings and Player Experience
Sometimes, latency is affected by the player’s own device or connection. Offering settings that let users adjust graphic detail, frame rate, or network smoothing can help improve their experience.
If your game includes a ping display or network status icon, players can better understand what’s happening during gameplay. This transparency reduces confusion when things go wrong.
It’s also helpful to test the game under less-than-perfect conditions. Simulating high-latency or lossy connections gives insight into how the game holds up and where improvements are needed.
Reducing latency in online games isn’t about one fix. It’s a mix of smart decisions—from protocol choice and server placement to code design and prediction handling. Every millisecond saved brings the game closer to real-time, where every action feels tight, fair, and responsive.
No Responses